Teachers, I see you. 

Classrooms today are not easy to manage. Many students are coming to school with greater needs: inattention, low frustration tolerance, and weak social skills. They seem to be worse than what teachers were seeing a few years ago. Unfortunately, these issues often result in misbehavior. 

When students are distracted, impulsive, or quick to push back, traditional classroom management is often not enough. That doesn’t mean you are doing anything wrong. It means we need practical, proactive systems that reduce power struggles, increase structure, and help students function more successfully at school. 

This article offers strategies you can use to support behavior, strengthen focus, and make the classroom feel more workable again.

Setting the Stage for Success

Each of us has our own preference for class structure, consistency, and management. I believe it is important to understand that we need to be free to be ourselves and have our own styles of running our classrooms. Yet, some teaching styles seem to lend themselves well to today’s inclusive populations, where others are more challenging for both students and teachers.

Consider these approaches for a successful classroom environment:

• Consistency without rigidity

• Firm discipline without power struggles

• Reasonable flexibility without lax standards

• The goal of the lesson rather than the specifics of the process

• Learning as the goal, rather than focusing on just that test grade

Physical Structure and Environmental Variables

Before we address behavior directly, I always suggest looking at the physical environment.

Consider Classroom Seating Options

Can we change student seating? I try to move students who struggle to self-regulate closer to the center of instruction, closer to me, or away from distractions. Consider allowing a student to choose a new seat as part of a win-win behavior plan. This ensures the student owns the behavior and the solution. 

The Personal Office Solution

I’ve also found DIY study carrels to be valuable.

I first saw them in use in a fifth grade classroom. I wasn’t sure they would be well received when I introduced them to my high school students, yet some of the students loved them. They provide a space free of distractions as well as a secure personal space. I did not force these on students. It was an option I provided. 

For example, I might say, “You can choose a different seat as well as a ‘personal office’ or you can choose to stay where you are sitting. However, that seat does not appear to be working for you. Make a good choice for yourself.” 

The Spacing Solution

Increase the distance between desks and provide more space if possible. Scan the room frequently and stay alert to what students are engaged in at all times. Okay, I know you don’t have eyes in the back of your head and there are times when you can’t see everything. Try to stay with me. You may find these ideas are worth considering. Some of the classrooms I’ve observed in the past few years are crowded. I’m empathetic to the challenge educators face when they are trying to teach thirty students all at once, often in a multi-ability classroom. 

The Grouping Solution – Mixed Ability Groups with Role Models

Finally, we should avoid seating students who struggle academically together as a permanent seating arrangement. It singles them out for stigmatization and creates a situation where they may feed off each other behaviorally.

The Technique that Changed My Teacher Life: Proactive Behavior Plans

I have found this approach to be highly effective with adolescents. It is based on a proactive choice model, and the goal is to teach young people how to take control of their own lives, make more effective choices, and develop the strength to handle daily problems. 

At its foundation is the belief that all humans choose behaviors in an attempt to fulfill basic needs like belonging, freedom, fun, power, and survival. Because human behavior is internally motivated, the only person’s behavior we can control is our own. Each of us fulfills these needs differently. 

Our goal as educators is to get students to evaluate their present behavior and determine whether it is actually meeting their needs.

In one example, we might ask a student if their behavior is getting them what they want. If the student is talking constantly in class and loses a privilege, the student who wants belonging or fun is not getting what he wants through their behavior. 

On the contrary, they are losing the thing they want and need. If the student is not getting what they need with their present behavior, making a specific plan for change is required. They must make a plan and a commitment to follow through with that plan. In my experience, students would prefer to be kicked out of class to sit in the office (which many find more entertaining than being in class) than sit with me and make a plan for better behavior!

As an adult, I do not do the choosing for the student. I may offer suggestions to help the student come up with solutions. Ultimately, the student must make the choice and commit to it. In this way, the student owns his behavior.

Guidelines for Discussion: The Win-Win Discipline Plan

*My work in this area was significantly influenced by Glasser’s Control Theory and Choice Theory philosophy and Kagan’s Win-Win Discipline framework. 

When having these discussions, I find there are four key questions we need to address: 

What were you doing that was unacceptable? 

I found that asking “What is the problem?”  which was how I learned the approach from Glasser’s work, often led to an answer like “I don’t know. I wasn’t doing anything wrong!” For me, “What were you doing that was unacceptable?” is a more direct, less vague, and more productive question. The purpose here is to focus on the specific behavior that’s causing the problem. Try to avoid confronting values or attitudes and just stick to the behavior.

Whose expectations are not being met? 

This needs to be a part of the discussion. If it is the student’s own expectations, I might start with, “I am concerned”. If it is my expectation regarding rules, I simply state, “Part of my job as a teacher is to keep you safe” or “to create a safe environment. When you poke the student in front of you with scissors, that’s not safe.” 

What do you want as a result of the conversation? 

State what you want and word it in the form of a solution. Tell them, “I want to figure out a way that we both win”. Do not get sucked into arguing about the problem. Students are often skilled at avoiding responsibility. They resort to bantering, badgering, and blaming to get out of trouble. 

What will the resolution include? 

The resolution might include a plan for the future or logical consequences. Most importantly, the plan must include a commitment. If it does not, a new plan must be worked out that the student can commit to. When children are resistant to planning, I simply tell them that they will continue meeting with me after school (or another time) until we work it out and create a plan that we both feel comfortable with. 

Yes, this took a lot of my time in the beginning. By January, Students knew that if they didn’t follow the rules we created and agreed to as a class, they would be stuck sitting with me to make a behavior plan. They felt that was worse than other consequences. I realize that some children are so attention starved they may want that time with you. That’s where you get to be creative in how you implement the framework. 

Conclusion

I believe one of the most important things we can do is stop thinking about behavior only in terms of consequences and start thinking more proactively. When we make small changes to the environment, stay consistent without turning everything into a power struggle, and help students take ownership of their choices, we set everyone up for more success. This does not mean students should not be accountable. It means we address behavior in a way that is more likely to teach, support, and actually change it.If you are looking for more practical strategies you can use right away, I invite you to visit my free download page. I’ve put together additional tools and ideas to help you support struggling learners and make your classroom feel more workable again.

FAQ

What are proactive behavior supports in the classroom?
Proactive behavior supports are classroom strategies designed to prevent behavior problems before they escalate. Instead of reacting only after a student misbehaves, teachers use structure, consistency, seating adjustments, clear expectations, and problem-solving routines to help students stay regulated and successful.

How can classroom management support struggling learners?
Classroom management supports struggling learners when it reduces distractions, avoids unnecessary power struggles, and gives students tools to make better choices. Small environmental changes, flexible seating options, consistent routines, and behavior plans can help students focus, participate, and take more ownership of their behavior.

What is a win-win discipline plan?
A win-win discipline plan is a proactive problem-solving approach that helps students reflect on their behavior, identify what is not working, and commit to a better plan. The goal is not just punishment. The goal is to help the student make choices that meet their needs while also protecting the learning environment.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Classroom Management Strategies That Work: Proactive Behavior Supports for Struggling Learners appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

The Shift: Why One Way is No Longer Enough

Classroom accessibility in the general education classroom requires more than differentiation. It requires structured choice. This approach helps teachers reach diverse learning styles and improve student engagement without changing the core standard.

The “Talk-and-Test” era was simple. Say it. Assign it. Test it. This method assumes every student processes information the same way. We know that isn’t true.

If I teach one way, I get the kids whose learning preferences match that way.

If I teach a concept in multiple ways: I get almost everyone. That is the goal.

When we rely on one method of teaching and testing, we measure compliance. We do not measure learning. We are just seeing who can handle our specific style of teaching. If we want to reach every student, we have to change how they get to the content.

NOTE: I understand that some educators reading this just balked at what I wrote with these thoughts, “But, my [fill in the blank – principal, department head, supervisor, etc.] says that I have to follow the script in the teachers manual provided by the X,Y, Z publisher. 

Please read the rest with a problem solving mindset. Can you incorporate any of these ideas into your teaching and still maintain the fidelity of the lesson plan you are required to teach. 

The Instructional Shift

Traditional One-Way Instruction

• Focuses on “say it, assign it, test it.”
• Measures how well a student follows a method.
• Works for some students but leaves most behind.
• Relies heavily on talk-and-text delivery.

Multi-Modal Access

• Provides multiple ways to access the same idea.
• Measures the student’s actual understanding.
• Accelerates learning for almost every student.
• Varies how students interact with the work.

This shift starts with the students in the room. You have to look at the students sitting in front of you in your classroom(s).

Identifying Learning Strengths: The Nine Student Learning Preferences

Every student has a way of working that feels natural to them. These preferences are tools for expansion. They are not labels for pigeonholing children. When you recognize these clues, you open the door to the work necessary to reach all learners.

• The Word Kids (Verbal Learners): They tell stories and explain ideas. Their strength is remembering what they hear or read.
• The System Thinkers (Logical Learners): They ask how it works and hate pointless worksheets. Their strength is finding patterns and solving problems.
• The Movers (Kinesthetic Learners): They fidget and tap to stay focused. Their strength is showing what they know through action.
• The Visual Learners: They doodle to stay with you. Their strength is understanding a drawing faster than a page of text.
• The Rhythm Learners: They hum or tap while they work. Their strength is remembering through patterns in sound.
• The Talkers (Collaborative Learners): They need to say it out loud to understand it. Their strength is collaborating and leading others.
• The Quiet Processors: They prefer to think first and talk later. Their strength is being reflective and self-aware.
• The Detail Seekers: They notice things others miss. Their strength is connecting lessons to practical, real-world systems.
• The Big Picture Thinkers: They disengage if the work feels pointless. Their strength is connecting learning to a larger purpose.

These learning preferences help us see that students are not being difficult. They are just trying to process what we are teaching. When they can’t, that’s often when we lose them. 

From Chaos to Structured Choice

Many teachers worry that giving options leads to chaos. It doesn’t. Structured choice is not the same as having no plan.

You do not need to create 27 different lesson plans. That is impossible. You only need to adjust student access to the same educational standard.

When we open up options, we stop fighting the students. We start helping them do the work.

Instead of asking, “Which students can handle my lesson?” ask, “How many ways can students access this idea?” Next, ask yourself, ‘How many of these ways can I sprinkle into my lesson plan and stay sane.’ I realize teachers often have ridiculous demands on their time and these ‘options’ may seem overwhelming. Take baby steps to incorporate different learning preferences into a lesson plan. Once those first steps become part of your teaching repertoire, then try others. 

Theory is fine. But teachers need to know what to do when the bell rings on Monday.

The Monday Morning Strategy Guide

You do not have to overhaul your entire curriculum at once. Start small. Give students two or three options for an assignment. Use these low-prep strategies to get started.

1. For Word Kids: Let them write a script or an article. They can teach a peer or create debate questions.
2. For System Thinkers: Have them build a timeline or design an experiment. They can compare and contrast two ideas.
3. For Movers: Let them act it out or build a model. They can use a simulation or create a physical demonstration.
4. For Visual Thinkers: Ask them to draw it. They can make a map or an infographic. Use color to organize notes.
5. For Rhythm Learners: Let them create a chant or a rhythmic explanation. They can explain the learning out loud to themselves.
6. For Quiet Processors: Give them time to think first. Let them journal or write personal connections before they have to share.
7. For Talkers: Use a turn and talk. Let them teach a friend or participate in a group debate.
8. For Detail Seekers: Ask them to apply the lesson to a real-life situation. Let them sort or categorize information into systems.
9. For Big Picture Thinkers: Let them explore the “why” behind the lesson. Connect the topic to a larger goal or a real-world value.

The content stays the same. The standard stays the same. Only the path changes.

This is the foundation of structured choice and differentiated instruction in today’s classroom.

The Impact: Measuring What Matters

When you use structured choice, the classroom changes. You stop measuring who can sit still. You start measuring who understands the material.

The results are immediate:

• Engagement goes up because students feel capable.
• Behavior issues go down because students aren’t frustrated.
• Confidence grows because students have a way to succeed.

The goal is for a student to say: “I get it.”

When a student finally accesses the content in a way that works, the shift is instant.

Once you see that happen, you don’t go back.

Frequently Asked Questions About Structured Choice in the Classroom

What is structured choice in the classroom?
Structured choice is an instructional strategy that gives students multiple ways to access and demonstrate learning while maintaining the same academic standard and learning objective.

How is structured choice different from differentiated instruction?
Structured choice is a practical application of differentiated instruction. It focuses specifically on offering students options in how they engage with content, process information, and demonstrate understanding.Does giving students choices create classroom management issues?
No. When implemented correctly, structured choice improves classroom management by increasing engagement, reducing frustration, and giving students clear, purposeful ways to participate in learning.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Classroom Accessibility Handbook: Structured Choice in the General Classroom appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

School administrators often ask me what co-teaching should look like. It is a fair question. Assessing a collaborative classroom is especially challenging for administrators who are new to the concept of co-teaching.

Too often, schools use what I call the dumped-in method of co-teaching. Teachers are simply dumped into it without support or training. The result is predictable. You walk into a classroom and see one teacher teaching while the other teacher stands in the background waiting for permission to work with students. Some specialists feel like they are just holding up the wall. 

That is not co-teaching.

Administrators need to view co-taught classes as classes taught by two essential teachers working as one team.

To help school leaders observe and support these teams, I have developed the 2026 Walkthrough Form. It provides a non-evaluative snapshot of classroom practice for administrators. It moves beyond vague theories and focuses on the practical realities of the classroom.

Here is exactly what you should look for when you walk into a co-taught class.

Specific Implementations

Observers should look for clearly defined roles. General approaches are no longer enough. I have detailed two dozen specific co-teaching implementations. Look for targeted strategies like Two Facilitate Speed Partnering or One Teach and One Summarize. There should be absolutely no doubt as to what each person is doing during a lesson.

Shared Ownership and Parity

Both adults must actively contribute to instruction and student engagement. They do not have to look identical to demonstrate parity. They also do not both need to be content experts. You should see them share ownership of the class through their actions, language, or leadership. Both names should be displayed, and the physical space must be shared. Furthermore, both adults should interact with a range of students, not just one subgroup.

Chunking Lesson Plans

Look at the clock. Teachers should transition smoothly between short chunks of instruction. Ideally, these chunks are ten minutes or less. The most effective time managers use timers to stay on track. This maximizes student engagement and keeps both teachers actively involved. 

Stop Guessing, Start Teaching:
Introducing the Co-Teaching Lesson Plan Builder

Student Access and Differentiation

Are students engaged and clear on what they are expected to do? Teachers need to provide multiple ways to learn content. This might look like visual interpretations, graphic organizers, or technology like backchanneling. Students must also have choices in how they demonstrate their learning. Furthermore, teachers should be using formative assessments, like exit cards or Oral K-W-L activities, to guide immediate instruction.

Data and Flexible Grouping

Notice how the students are grouped. Students should work in intentional mixed-ability groups for practice. They might also work in targeted same-ability groups for review and enrichment. You should also see teachers collecting objective data on student behavior and understanding to guide future instruction.

Effective co-teaching is a partnership. It requires communication, persistence, and mutual agreement. This new walkthrough form gives you the framework to support your teachers in that work. It helps you focus on what matters most.

Access the  2026 Walkthrough Form by clicking here. 

It is imperative that administrators understand what co-teaching is and what it is not. Also, it’s important to coach and mentor your staff in a positive, productive way to achieve the best possible results while making it clear that collaboration is not optional. 

In this age of testing, fear, and reprisal, teachers need to be motivated and taught how to best utilize their time and efforts to help students succeed. Co-teaching, done well, is one of the best ways to make a difference for students. 

I encourage you to download the 2026 Walkthrough Form and take it on your next classroom visit. Look for specific implementations and shared ownership that accelerate learning. Try the form today. Observe your collaborative teams and give your teachers the practical, targeted feedback they need to thrive.

Frequently Asked Questions About Co-Teaching

What does effective co-teaching look like in a classroom?
Effective co-teaching involves two educators actively sharing instruction, planning together, and engaging students through clearly defined roles and strategies.

What are the most common co-teaching mistakes?
The most common mistake is the “one teach, one assist” default, where one teacher leads and the other becomes passive. Lack of planning and unclear roles also limit effectiveness.

How can administrators evaluate co-teaching?
Administrators should use structured observation tools that focus on parity, student engagement, differentiation, and data-driven instruction rather than general impressions.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of co-teaching strategies and resources to maximize student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Best Practices in Co-teaching and Collaboration: the HOW of Implementing the Models

The post What Should a Co-Taught Class Look Like? Introducing the 2026 Walkthrough Form appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

Walk into any general education classroom and you will see a wide range of learners working through the same content. Some students move through it easily. Others struggle to keep up, and some become disengaged before they ever have a chance to succeed. The challenge for educators is clear: how do we support struggling learners in an inclusive classroom without lowering expectations or slowing instruction for everyone else?

One of the most effective answers is the combination of MTSS, or Multi-Tiered System of Supports, and microlearning.

Why MTSS Is the Starting Point

MTSS offers a proactive framework to identify and support students’ academic and behavioral needs. At its core, MTSS ensures that all students get high-quality, differentiated instruction, with more intensive interventions added as needed. It’s structured in tiers — Tier 1 is general classroom instruction for all students, Tier 2 provides targeted support, and Tier 3 offers intensive intervention, often outside the general ed classroom (Fitzell, MTSS and RTI – Seven Keys to Success).

Tier 1 isn’t just “basic” teaching. It must include best practices rooted in research — strategies that work for everyone but are critical for different learners (Fitzell, p. 2). In other words, general education instruction should be so effective and inclusive that fewer students require more intensive interventions.

MTSS helps schools provide early, systematic support so students receive the right level of instruction before learning gaps become long-term barriers.

Microlearning: The MTSS Multiplier

Microlearning breaks instruction into short, focused chunks that students can process more easily. Instead of asking learners to absorb too much at once, teachers deliver key content in smaller segments with immediate opportunities to practice, discuss, reflect, and apply what they are learning.

This approach aligns perfectly with Susan Fitzell’s Chunking Lesson Plans®, which recommends dividing instruction into short bursts to support retention and reduce cognitive overload (Fitzell, MTSS Article; Fitzell, p. 122).

In practice, this might mean delivering a mini-lesson, followed by a brief activity, a peer discussion, or a visual processing task. The idea is to teach less at once, but with greater clarity and more opportunities for student interaction.

When we combine MTSS with microlearning:

• Tier 1 instruction becomes more accessible.
  
• Tier 2 interventions feel more natural — embedded right into flexible grouping and small-group instruction.
  
• Tier 3 supports are easier to design because we’ve already gathered consistent progress-monitoring data along the way (Fitzell, MTSS Article).

Microlearning in Action

Picture this: Instead of lecturing on the causes of the Civil War for 45 minutes, the teacher breaks the topic into three mini-lessons. Each one includes a quick mnemonic device, a relevant visual (like a snapshot organizer), and a short paired discussion. Now students are encoding the same content multiple ways — a key principle of brain-based learning (Fitzell, p. 20).

Meanwhile, struggling students aren’t overwhelmed. They’re engaged, active participants — gaining small wins that build confidence.

Final Thoughts

MTSS and microlearning are not quick fixes, but together they create a more responsive way to teach. When instruction is delivered in smaller, brain-friendly chunks within a tiered support system, struggling learners do not have to wait for failure before they receive help. They experience success earlier, build confidence faster, and stay more engaged in the learning process.

FAQ

What is MTSS in education?

MTSS, or Multi-Tiered System of Supports, is a framework schools use to provide academic and behavioral support at increasing levels of intensity. Tier 1 includes high-quality instruction for all students, Tier 2 adds targeted intervention, and Tier 3 provides intensive individualized support.

What is microlearning in the classroom?

Microlearning is an instructional approach that breaks lessons into short, focused chunks. Instead of presenting too much information at once, teachers deliver content in smaller parts with opportunities for practice, reflection, and feedback. This helps students process and retain new learning more effectively.

How do MTSS and microlearning work together?

MTSS and microlearning work well together because both focus on meeting student needs in a structured, responsive way. MTSS provides the framework for support, while microlearning helps teachers deliver instruction in manageable steps that reduce overload and increase understanding.

Why does microlearning help struggling learners?

Microlearning helps struggling learners because it reduces cognitive overload and gives students more chances to interact with content in meaningful ways. Smaller learning segments can improve focus, retention, participation, and confidence, especially for students who are easily overwhelmed by long lectures or large amounts of information.

Can MTSS and microlearning benefit all students?

Yes. Although these strategies are especially helpful for struggling learners, they benefit all students by making instruction clearer, more engaging, and easier to process. In an inclusive classroom, strong Tier 1 instruction supported by microlearning can improve outcomes across the board.

Additional Reading 

MTSS and RTI – Seven Keys to Success
By Susan Fitzell https://susanfitzell.com/mtss-seven-keys-successful-rti/

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post How MTSS and Microlearning Improve Student Confidence and Achievement appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

One powerful solution is to combine microlearning with MTSS. In an inclusive classroom, small chunks of instruction, quick checks for understanding, and targeted intervention can help students access content, build confidence, and make steady academic progress.

In today’s inclusive classrooms, ensuring every student, from the advanced to the struggling learner, reaches their potential is the core mission. The Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) provides the organizational framework for this goal, addressing the needs of all learners through differentiated instruction. By integrating “microlearning” or the intentional use of small chunks of instruction and activities, educators can effectively deliver the tiered interventions essential to MTSS, especially in a secondary environment where finding adequate time for intervention is often a challenge.

The Framework: MTSS and Tiered Instruction

MTSS, or Multi-Tiered System of Supports, is a framework schools use to provide increasing levels of academic and behavioral support based on student need.

MTSS encompasses several approaches, including Response to Intervention (RTI). This system is graphically represented as an umbrella, emphasizing failure prevention. Central to MTSS/RTI is a tiered model of support:

• Tier One (Universal Support): This foundational level requires the use of best practice, research-based teaching methods, including differentiated instruction, for all students (80–90% of the population). Implementing effective strategies in the core classroom significantly reduces the need for subsequent interventions.
• Tier Two (Targeted Support): This tier is for students requiring targeted, high-quality interventions (5–10% of students). These interventions often use research-based practices from Tier One but are modified to provide more intense instruction, increased time for practice, and a higher intensity of implementation for specific students. For secondary students, strategies such as a tutor-led study hall combined with frequent, immediate in-class interventions, made possible by Chunking Lesson Plans™, can be highly effective.
• Tier Three (Intensive Individual Interventions): This tier serves the smallest percentage of students (1–5%) who require the most intensive interventions, often a combination of general classroom instruction and specialized outside-of-class support.

The Strategy: Small Chunks, Big Gains

The key to implementing effective interventions within a busy class schedule, particularly at the secondary level, lies in breaking down content and instruction into manageable segments. This concept is explicitly leveraged in “Chunking Lesson Plans®” to maximize instructional time and target student needs precisely.

How Microlearning Prevents Cognitive Overload

The goal of this microlearning approach is to prevent cognitive overload—since the brain typically holds only three to four chunks of novel information in short-term memory at a time—and enhance memory and retention.

What a Chunked Lesson Looks Like in a 40-Minute Class

A core component of this microlearning strategy is to shorten the duration of whole-class direct teaching. For example, in a 40-minute class period, the plan might involve:

1. Core Teach (10 minutes): Deliver essential instruction (e.g., teaching a concept like genre or the FOIL method) as effectively as if teaching a small group of capable students, and then stop.
2. Practice in Mixed Ability Groups (10 minutes): Immediately follow the core instruction by having students practice the new information in mixed-ability groups, allowing for application and reinforcement.
3. Whole Class Check-in (5 minutes): Bring the class back together for a quick question-and-answer session to clarify concepts and gauge understanding based on observations during group work.
4. Exit Card/Assessment (5 minutes): Use a quick assessment, such as an exit card with two or three questions, to immediately determine who needs re-teaching, practice, or enrichment.

Microlearning Strategies That Support Inclusive Instruction

The data collected from quick, frequent assessments like exit cards inform targeted, micro-interventions for the next class period. This allows the teacher to address learning differences right away, using the time saved from excessive direct instruction.

This can take the form of same-ability groups (e.g., grouping struggling students for a re-teach session) or peer-assisted learning models. Peer tutoring is especially effective, as it reinforces the tutor’s knowledge and skills while developing responsibility and self-confidence, making learning materials accessible and meaningful.

Enhancing Learning Through Small Adjustments

Microlearning principles extend beyond time management into the design of instructional materials and learning activities that respect how students learn. This includes utilizing multimodal strategies and cognitive supports:

• Visual Cues and Organization: Provide information in small chunks (5 to 7 pieces of information) and use graphic organizers, flowcharts, or mind maps to visually categorize material and demonstrate complex processes, freeing up working memory for higher-level thinking.
• Aiding Memory: Employ mnemonics, acronyms (like NASA), rhymes, and visualization techniques to aid recall, as the brain typically remembers color and unique visual content better than plain text. Even handwriting instructions clearly or adapting existing materials with adequate white space and larger font size provides essential scaffolding.
• Kinesthetic Engagement: Incorporate movement, like standing stations or acting out vocabulary words, to increase oxygen flow to the brain and engage multiple areas in the learning process, supporting kinesthetic learners and enhancing retention.
• Fostering Self-Regulation: By implementing chunked assignments with parts due at specific dates, students (especially perceptive types) can manage their workload effectively and are actively taught organizational strategies and self-monitoring skills, key components of success in a personalized learning environment.

By systematically implementing small, targeted instructional practices within the overarching MTSS framework, educators can create an inclusive environment where the focus shifts from struggling with content presentation to achieving mastery through individualized and carefully paced learning opportunities. This intentional focus on small chunks yields big gains for all students.

If you’d like more practical strategies to help your team move from awareness to action, I offer PD sessions and coaching built around the strategies outlined in Special Needs in the General Classroom. Let’s build forward—not backward.

FAQ: Microlearning, MTSS, and Inclusive Classrooms

What is microlearning in the classroom?
Microlearning in the classroom is the practice of delivering instruction in short, focused segments instead of long blocks of direct teaching. Teachers use small chunks of content, quick practice opportunities, and brief assessments to help students process information more effectively and avoid cognitive overload.

How does microlearning support MTSS?
Microlearning supports MTSS by making tiered instruction more manageable and responsive. In Tier One, it improves core instruction for all students. In Tier Two, it allows for targeted reteaching and focused practice. In Tier Three, it helps educators deliver more intensive, individualized intervention based on student data.

Why is chunking instruction effective for struggling learners?
Chunking instruction is effective because it reduces the amount of new information students must process at one time. When content is broken into smaller parts, students are more likely to understand, retain, and apply what they are learning. This is especially helpful for students with working memory challenges, attention differences, or gaps in prior knowledge.

Can microlearning help advanced students too?
Yes. Microlearning benefits advanced learners as well as struggling learners. Because instruction is clearer and more intentional, advanced students can move more quickly into application, peer support, discussion, and enrichment tasks. In an inclusive classroom, small chunks create flexibility for all learners.

What are simple microlearning strategies teachers can use right away?
Teachers can start with short direct instruction, mixed-ability practice groups, exit cards, graphic organizers, movement-based review, mnemonic supports, and chunked assignments with clear deadlines. These strategies fit well within an MTSS model because they provide immediate data and support differentiated instruction.

Additional Reading 

MTSS and RTI – Seven Keys to Success
By Susan Fitzell https://susanfitzell.com/mtss-seven-keys-successful-rti/

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post How Microlearning Supports MTSS in Inclusive Classrooms appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

What if we designed classrooms around how the brain learns best; not just standards, pacing guides, or coverage goals? As schools shift toward inclusive education, teachers need approaches that reach a wide range of learners without lowering expectations. One practical way to do that is to combine brain-based learning principles with a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and microlearning. Together, they strengthen Tier 1 instruction, reduce cognitive overload, and build the self-regulation students need to become successful, independent learners.

Susan Fitzell’s School House Model provides a visual framework for aligning instruction with student needs. This model reminds us that academic instruction, represented by the “Functions” or nuts and bolts (the curriculum), must be supported by two critical structures. The foundation is based on building a strong community, connection, and cooperation. Above this foundation is the “Framework,” which must be based on current brain and educational research and an understanding of how students learn. MTSS and microlearning work together to support this comprehensive, whole-house approach—from foundation to function.

Brain-Based Meets Tier-Based

MTSS is a multi-tiered system that incorporates Response to Intervention (RTI), with a core goal of failure prevention. The foundational element, Tier One, demands the use of best practice, research-based teaching methods, including differentiated instruction, for all students (80–90% of the population),,. Implementing brain-friendly strategies in Tier 1 benefits all learners, ensuring instruction aligns with how the brain naturally processes and retains information.

A traditional reading lesson might involve extended reading and a standard writing prompt. However, a brain-friendly approach leverages microlearning techniques to maintain engagement and retention:

• Color-coding vocabulary to support memory encoding: Color is a powerful memory tool, helping students retain information better than black and white text. Using color to categorize or highlight text makes the information unique, aiding visual recall,. Color-coding the parts of speech, for example, assigns nouns a unique color (like red, relating to a stop sign) and verbs a movement color (like green, relating to ‘go’).

• Paired think-alouds to encourage interpersonal interaction and verbal rehearsal: Verbalizing concepts is crucial for learning, as students often discover gaps in their understanding when they attempt to explain information to others. Strategies like Think-Pair-Share or Thinking Aloud Paired Problem Solving (TAPPS) engage students in active rehearsal.

• Chunked instruction, where students process one paragraph at a time using graphic organizers: The brain’s capacity for holding new information in short-term memory is limited to roughly three to four chunks at a time. Breaking down content into smaller, manageable pieces prevents cognitive overload. Using graphic organizers, flowcharts, or mind maps during this process visually categorizes material and helps students see patterns and relationships, supporting deeper understanding.

• Doodling key ideas as a form of nonlinguistic representation: Nonlinguistic representation, such as drawing or visualizing concepts, is a research-supported strategy that requires students to process content in new ways. This “production effect”—speaking or drawing during recall—further strengthens the encoding and memory consolidation process.

All these methods employ differentiation (Differentiated Instruction or DI) that is “good for all” students and “critical for different learners”, making instruction effective for everyone in the general classroom environment.

Self-Regulation: The Secret Weapon

The goal of instruction is to move students from being struggling learners to being successful learners by fostering self-regulation. Self-regulated learning is the most important characteristic of expert learners. These learners implement a plan that includes setting clear performance and process goals, employing clear strategies (including time management), controlling their motivation, and monitoring their own progress.

Microlearning supports these metacognitive habits. For instance, perceptive students often procrastinate, seeking information until the last minute. Teachers can mitigate this by breaking assignments down into small chunks with specific due dates, teaching students organizational strategies and self-monitoring skills. When students practice strategies frequently for short amounts of time, it is more effective than overwhelming the brain with too much at once, accelerating the learning process.

Beyond Remediation

Too often, struggling students are pulled out, slowed down, or given “easier” material, creating lower expectations that diminish their chance to achieve their greatest potential. But what if the problem isn’t the student—it’s the size of the instructional bite?

Instead of relying solely on remediation after failure, MTSS encourages adapting Tier 1 instruction to prevent failure from the outset. By intentionally structuring lessons using small, brain-aligned chunks—such as the Chunking Lesson Plans™ approach,—teachers ensure that instruction matches the capacity of the brain to learn and process new concepts effectively. This way, students who might otherwise be labeled “at risk” or “learning disabled” can remain in the rigorous general classroom environment, benefiting from high expectations and specialized instructional support embedded seamlessly into the daily lesson.

FAQ

1. How does microlearning support MTSS, especially Tier 1?
Microlearning fits Tier 1 because it makes strong, research-based instruction easier for all learners to process and retain. Instead of long, overloaded lessons, teachers deliver content in smaller chunks with frequent practice, which aligns with working memory limits and reduces cognitive overload. This improves engagement and retention for the 80–90% served in Tier 1, and it helps prevent failure before students need more intensive tiers.

2. What brain-based strategies in the article are most useful for differentiated instruction in a general classroom?
The article highlights four practical strategies that scale well in Tier 1 while still meeting diverse needs: color-coding vocabulary or parts of speech to strengthen encoding and recall; paired think-alouds like Think-Pair-Share or TAPPS to build rehearsal and reveal misunderstandings; chunked instruction using graphic organizers to manage working memory limits; and doodling or drawing key ideas as nonlinguistic representation to deepen processing and improve recall.

Why does “chunking” matter from a brain-based learning perspective?
Because working memory can hold only a small number of new “chunks” at once, long passages or multi-step directions can overload students, especially those who struggle. Chunking instruction into smaller parts, like one paragraph at a time, helps students process information without the system collapsing under cognitive load. Pairing chunking with visual tools like graphic organizers helps students see patterns and relationships, which supports deeper understanding.

How do think-aloud strategies improve learning and assessment at the same time?
When students verbalize their thinking, they rehearse the content, which strengthens learning. At the same time, explaining ideas out loud often exposes gaps in understanding that silent work can hide. Structures like Think-Pair-Share or TAPPS create a routine for interpersonal interaction, immediate feedback, and active processing, which supports both comprehension and retention.

How does this approach shift MTSS away from remediation and toward prevention?
Instead of pulling students out, lowering expectations, or giving “easier” work after failure, the article argues for improving Tier 1 instruction so more students succeed in the rigorous general classroom. By designing lessons around small, brain-aligned instructional “bites,” and embedding supportive strategies as part of everyday teaching, students who might otherwise be labeled “at risk” can keep up with higher expectations while receiving targeted support inside the core environment.

Bibliography

Burnett, S. (n.d.). The A-Z of Differentiated Instruction.

Cowan, N. (2010). The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science a Journal of the American Psychological Society, 19(1), 51–57. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277

Fitzell, S. G. (n.d.). 360 Inservice, slide 3.

Fitzell, S. G. (n.d.). 360 Inservice, slide 165.

Fitzell, S. G. (2011). RTI Strategies for Secondary Teachers. London: Sage Publications.

Fitzell, S. G. (2017). Special Needs in the General Classroom: 500+ Teaching Strategies for Differentiating Instruction (3rd ed.). Manchester: Cogent Catalyst Publications.

Marzano Debra J. Pollock, Jane E., R. J. P., Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Wong, B. (2010). Points of view: Color coding. Nature Methods, 7(8), 573–573. http://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0810-573.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Building Brain-Friendly Classrooms with MTSS and Microlearning appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

The moment is painfully familiar: you’ve repeated a direction three times, and your student or child is still staring blankly. You immediately think, ‘They just aren’t listening.’ But what if the problem isn’t ‘won’t listen’ but ‘can’t process’?”  If we want to support students with Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) effectively, we must shift our focus from behavioral compliance to auditory processing strategies.

The APD Shift: Why It’s Wiring, Not Willpower

We have to start by looking at the biology of the brain rather than the behavior of the child. Research tells us that the brain’s working memory—essentially the brain’s sticky note—can only hold about three to four “chunks” of new information at one time.

If you give a child five verbal instructions in a row, and they only do the first three, they aren’t necessarily being defiant. Their working memory literally dropped the last two. The feedback signal in their brain failed, and the system collapsed. This is often the case for students with ADHD or auditory processing issues. They may be physically hearing the sound of your voice, but they cannot process the meaning effectively, especially if there is background noise.

To tell the difference, I recommend a simple test: Change the input method. If a child “ignores” a verbal request to clear off their desk, put their homework in their backpack, and get ready to meet the bus but immediately responds to a checklist or flowchart, it is not a behavioral refusal. It is a processing gap. We have to stop blaming the child for a mismatch between how we teach and how they are wired.

Bypass the Ear: Visual & Tactile Strategies That Stick”

If I had to give parents and teachers a life hack for giving directions that actually stick, it would be this: Minimize verbal instruction and emphasize using visual and tactile cues (often accompanying verbal instruction.) 

When we give verbal directions, they vanish the moment we say them for students with APD. For a child who struggles with processing, this is a nightmare. Instead, use effective auditory processing strategies that bypass the ear. I call this the “Checkbox Strategy.”

Write the directions down in a specific way. Use a checklist format with empty boxes next to each step. This works for two reasons. First, it offloads the information from their overwhelmed working memory onto the paper. Second, the act of physically checking off a box gives the brain a small dopamine hit. It feels good to complete a task.

Additionally, use the technology you already have. If your child is watching TV, turn on the Closed Captioning. This associates the written word with the auditory sound and reinforces language processing without you having to say a word. Using effective auditory processing strategies can make the difference between success and failure. 

Shifting the Narrative: From ‘Failure’ to ‘Strategist’

It is heartbreaking to watch a bright child begin to believe they are “stupid” simply because their brain processes information differently than their peers. I speak to you not just as a professional, but as a mother who has walked this path.

My son, Ian, was diagnosed with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) and dyslexia. Teachers told me he didn’t belong in honors classes and that he was an “overachiever” who was working too hard. If we had accepted that label, he might have given up. Instead, we focused on “double dosing” his instruction and honoring his unique learning preferences. We didn’t lower the bar; we just increased the support. Because he learned how he learns, he went on to earn a mechanical engineering degree.

We must shift the narrative from “I can’t learn” to “I need a different strategy.” When a child realizes they can succeed when the format changes, that internal voice changes from “I am a failure” to “I am a strategist.”

Reducing the Homework Battle

Finally, we need to address the battleground of homework and grading. We must separate “process” from “product.” If a child knows the science concepts but struggles with writing, and we fail them on a written test, we aren’t measuring their science IQ. We are measuring their writing deficit.

For homework, I recommend the “Half-Sheet Theory.” It is a simple psychological hack. Take a worksheet, put the content on the front and back of a half-sheet of paper, and cut it. When a student sees a full page of math problems, they often shut down. When they see a half-sheet, they think, “I can do this.” It is the same workload, but the visual presentation reduces the cognitive load.

By using these strategies, we build a bridge between the student’s potential and their performance.

FAQ

1. How can I tell if a student “won’t listen” or genuinely “can’t process” verbal directions?

For students who consistently miss multi-step verbal directions but succeed when you switch the input method, it’s likely a processing gap, not defiance. Try giving the same direction two ways; first verbally, then as a written checklist or simple flowchart. If performance improves immediately with the visual support, you’re seeing a mismatch between how you’re delivering information and how their brain processes it, not a behavior issue.

2. Why do multi-step directions fall apart so quickly for some students?

Working memory can only hold a small amount of new information at once (often about 3–4 “chunks”). So, when you give five verbal steps in a row, the student may retain only the first few and “drop” the rest, especially with background noise, attention challenges, or auditory processing difficulties. The fix is reducing load and changing the format.

3. What are the most effective auditory processing strategies when verbal directions don’t stick?

Use strategies that “bypass the ear” by pairing brief verbal cues with visual and tactile supports. A high-impact option is the Checkbox Strategy; write steps in a checklist with empty boxes so the student can offload memory to paper and track completion. Keep directions short, concrete, and sequenced. The goal is durability, directions that remain visible after your voice is gone.

4. How can closed captions help with auditory processing?

Closed captioning links spoken language to printed words in real time. That pairing reinforces language processing and comprehension without adding more instruction from you. It’s an easy, built-in support at home and in classrooms using video: captions help many students “catch” what their ears miss, especially in noisy environments or fast speech.

5. What type of homework can I assign to reduce parent-child conflict?

Separate “how much work it is” from “how big it looks.” The Half-Sheet Theory keeps the workload the same but reduces overwhelm by shrinking the visual presentation. Print the work on a half-sheet (front & back if needed). This lowers cognitive load, increases willingness to start, and helps students experience momentum instead of defeat before they begin.

Call To Action

“Ready to transform your classroom or home? Stop the battle and start seeing results. Explore the books, workbooks, and training resources that have helped thousands of families find success.

Get More Strategies

• What to Do to Help Students Improve Focus
  https://susanfitzell.com/what-to-do-to-help-students-improve-focus/
• Why Change Mindsets About Student Potential?
  https://susanfitzell.com/why-change-mindsets-about-student-potential/

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Won’t Listen or Can’t Process? Auditory Processing Strategies for Success appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

The Hamilton Project just released a deep dive into how the grade a student was in during the COVID-19 shutdowns impacted the long-term post-COVID learning recovery for struggling students. And, while I applaud the rigor of the research, let’s get one thing straight:

Yes, grade level matters.  But if we stop there, we miss the real story.

This isn’t just about test scores. It’s about students. Struggling learners. Kids with potential buried under disruption, disengagement, and disconnection. Kids who didn’t just fall behind, they lost belief in their ability to catch up.

So here’s my take on the report, and what schools should be doing right now to get real results.

Let’s Talk About What Really Got Lost

The research confirms what educators have been saying for years now: students in upper elementary and middle school during the pandemic took the hardest academic hits, especially in math. Younger students, who started school post-COVID, seem to be recovering faster.

What the study doesn’t show – but what every teacher knows – is that what got lost wasn’t just content.

• Confidence took a hit
• Self-regulation skills unraveled
• Routines and relationships were thrown out the window
• And for many students, the identity of being a “successful learner” quietly disappeared

We’re not just rebuilding reading and math skills. We’re rebuilding kids’ belief in themselves.

The Real Shift? From One-Size-Fits-All to What-Works-for-This-Kid

For decades, our system has taught, primarily, to the verbal-linguistic, auditory learner. That approach leaves out a huge number of students in every classroom, COVID or no COVID. Now, post-pandemic, it’s even more critical to embrace differentiated instruction that actually reaches diverse learners.

“Good for all. Critical for different learners.”

This is not a time to double down on rigid pacing guides and one-way teaching. It’s a time to lean hard into:

• Chunked instruction that reduces cognitive load
• Brain-based strategies that make learning stick
• Instructional strategies that reflect the varied ways students process and engage with content.
• Choice and autonomy that fuel motivation

Why Older Students Are Struggling More, and What to Do About It

The research is clear: the older the student during COVID, the greater the drop in math and reading proficiency. That makes sense. These students had the most pre-pandemic expectations placed on them and the most complex content to master with the least support.

But here’s what matters now: How do we help these students succeed?

Start with Self-Regulation

Recovery starts with teaching students how to learn, not just what to learn.

Struggling learners don’t just need tutoring. They need tools to:

• Set goals
• Monitor progress
• Use memory and organization strategies that fit their brain

These are the skills of self-regulated learners and they’re the key to turning the curve around. 

Make Memory Strategies Visual, Vivid, and Doable

Let’s stop relying on rote memorization and start using:

• Mnemonics and acronym memory devices
• Color-coded notes and “snapshot” devices
• Visual organizers like mind maps and concept webs

Students don’t need longer assignments. They need smarter strategies.

Offer Choice. Always.

Want sustained focus? Give students control.

Even something as simple as, “Do these three tasks in any order you choose,” gives kids a sense of autonomy, and with it, increased effort and engagement. 

Let them doodle, color-code, or sit on a wobble stool. These aren’t gimmicks, they’re neuroscience in action. 

Don’t Just Track the Curve, Change the Trajectory

I appreciate the Hamilton Project’s approach. Their cohort analysis gives us a better picture of the long game. But we can’t wait for long-term studies to take action.

If we’re serious about changing student outcomes, we need to:

• Redesign instruction around how students learn best
• Build classrooms that support personalized learning and inclusion
• Focus less on where the curve drops and more on where we lift it

Final Thought: Every Learner Deserves a Win

The question isn’t just, “What grade were they in when COVID hit?”  It’s, “What support are they getting now to succeed?”

And that, friends, is a question we can answer today.

Want more practical strategies to reach your struggling learners? Explore 500+ ways to differentiate and accelerate learning in my book,  Special Needs in the General Classroom – Order here or bring me in for a PD session that turns awareness into action.
www.susanfitzell.com

References: 

https://www.hamiltonproject.org/publication/post/learning-curves-post-covid-learning-trajectories-differ-by-the-grade-a-student-was-in-when-the-pandemic-hit

Special Needs in the General Classroom, 3rd Edition: 500+ Teaching Strategies for Differentiating Instruction, 3rd Edition, by Susan Gingras Fitzell, M. Ed. (Author)

FAQ: Supporting Learners After COVID Disruptions

• Why did older students struggle more academically during the COVID-19 pandemic?
  • Older students faced greater academic challenges because they had more complex content to master and higher pre-pandemic expectations, but received less support during remote learning. The disruption affected more than grades. It also impacted confidence, self-regulation, and students’ sense of themselves as learners.
• What are the most effective strategies for helping students recover lost learning and motivation?
  • Recovery begins with explicit instruction in self-regulation. Visual supports and brain-based memory strategies matter. Students also need choice and autonomy. Chunked instruction, differentiated tasks, and predictable classroom routines help rebuild skills and confidence at the same time.
• How can schools support diverse learners in a post-pandemic classroom?
  • Schools must move away from one-size-fits-all instruction. Differentiated teaching that meets students where they are is essential. This includes varied ways to engage with content, personalized learning plans, and inclusive classroom environments so every learner has a path to success.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post What COVID Learning Curves Miss: It’s Not Just About the Grade, It’s About the Learner appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

Introducing a new resource for co-teachers and school leaders: the Co-Teaching Lesson Plan Builder! Designed for inclusive education and collaborative planning, it supports special educators and general education teachers with clear implementation strategies aligned to best practices in co-teaching.

To Co-Teachers and School Administrators:

Co-teachers understand that the collaborative potential is enormous, but the logistical reality is often stressful. Finding the time to plan together, determining who does what, and ensuring true parity, especially when the special education teacher may not be comfortable with the content, can be a huge barrier to success. Many educators are still unsure how to effectively realize the huge potential of having two licensed professionals in one classroom.

The goal of effective co-teaching is to move beyond mere presence in the classroom to create a dynamic, engaging, and highly effective learning environment that fosters rigorous learning in an inclusive setting.

We understand the complexity involved, which is why we created the Co-Teaching Lesson Plan Builder, a new tool designed to transform your collaborative planning sessions from chaotic catch-ups into strategic, outcomes-driven blueprints.

The Problem: When Co-Teaching Fails to Reach its Potential

Historically, co-teaching models, even the popular ones like One Teach, One Assist, have often led to the specialist or special educator adopting a subordinate role as an assistant. This happens particularly when clearly defined examples of how to implement the models are missing. Teachers struggle to use more than one or two approaches consistently.

For administrators, this common pitfall means you are investing in a co-teaching initiative without maximizing the talents and professional skills of the adults involved, an outcome that risks the entire program’s success.

The Solution: Planning Beyond the Basics

The Co-Teaching Lesson Plan Builder is built on the foundation of maximizing teacher strengths and ensuring parity through highly specific, ready-to-implement scenarios. Drawing heavily on dozens of detailed strategies outlined in leading best practices, this tool focuses on The HOW of Co-Teaching, providing explicit titles and clear roles for every adult in the room.

How the Builder Works for Co-Teachers:

• Eliminate Role Confusion: The Builder helps clarify exactly what each teacher does during the lesson, offering specific titles to minimize any doubt as to roles and responsibilities.
  
• Maximize Diverse Talents: Instead of defaulting to the specialist taking the assistant role, the tool pulls from proven, precise strategies, many of which do not require the specialist to possess strong content knowledge. For instance, it might suggest One Teach—One Summarize, where the co-teacher listens to the core content being delivered and then summarizes the information to enhance student comprehension using different language or perspectives.
  
• Drive Engagement and Rigor: The Builder suggests high-impact implementations designed to foster professional respect and parity. It will recommend powerful techniques like Two Teach and Debate, where both teachers challenge, present opposite viewpoints, or play devil’s advocate to make class discussion more exciting and foster critical thinking. Or, for review, it might suggest Teach Half Then Switch, allowing both educators to focus on smaller groups for targeted instruction on specific skills versus content rigor.
  
• Instant Accessibility: You receive a structured lesson plan outline that delineates who leads which segment of instruction, allowing you to bypass hours of painstaking co-planning and utilize your limited face-to-face time for adjustments and individualized supports.

Benefits for School Leaders: Intentional Implementation and Staff Maximization

When implemented correctly, co-teaching works, but it requires administrators to commit to correct implementation and support teachers in the process. This tool provides the necessary structure.

• Fidelity to Best Practices: This tool ensures that your co-teaching teams are making intentional choices about which implementation to use, rather than “punting” or relying on the common, but often ineffective, One Teach, One Assist model. The ability to vary approaches based on lesson goals, student needs, and teacher comfort level is essential for successful, well-scheduled co-teaching.
  
• Effective Use of Certified Staff: By providing a clear framework for specific implementations, such as those that require only minimal content expertise from the specialist, administrators can be confident that two certified teachers are fully utilizing their professional talents to support rigorous learning and student growth, rather than having one teacher acting as a “glorified paraprofessional”.
  
• Support for Collaboration and Parity: The Builder provides a common, structured language for planning, to enhance communication and foster mutual respect and parity between team members.

Stop losing valuable planning time struggling to coordinate roles and map out complex activities. Give your teachers the clarity they need to achieve high standards and show growth across all learners.

Ready to maximize your co-teaching potential and save crucial planning time? Discover how the Co-Teaching Lesson Plan Builder supports inclusive classrooms, special educators, and co-teaching teams with step-by-step planning tools.

Frequently Asked Questions About Co-Teaching Planning

Q1: What is the primary purpose of effective co-teaching?

Effective co-teaching is defined as two or more certified teachers working together to provide instruction, typically in a heterogeneous inclusive setting. Its main purpose is to create a dynamic, engaging, and highly effective learning environment that promotes rigorous learning in an inclusive setting. When co-teaching is implemented correctly, it works significantly better than other teaching models to accelerate the achievement of all students,.

Q2: Why is the traditional “One Teach, One Assist” model often ineffective or discouraged?

While the “One Teach, One Assist” approach requires minimal co-planning, it is considered the least effective co-teaching approach and is often discouraged,. This model frequently results in the specialist or special education teacher adopting a subordinate role as an assistant. Consequently, students may consider one teacher the “real” teacher and the other teacher as the teacher’s aide. Furthermore, the supporting teacher often becomes distracted from the core lesson, dealing with student behavior or helping students who are off-track.

Q3: Does a co-teacher need to be a content area expert to successfully co-teach?

No, a co-teacher does not always require strong content expertise to be effective. Many high-impact co-teaching implementations, such as One Teach—One Summarize or Two Teach and Debate, are specifically designed so that the specialist does not need strong content knowledge,. For instance, in One Teach—One Summarize, the co-teacher only requires the ability to think and be a good listener to summarize the content.

Q4: How do specific co-teaching implementations differ from general co-teaching models?

Co-teaching models have evolved and, without clearly defined examples, educators often struggle to use more than one or two approaches consistently. The focus shifts to defining precise implementations, often called “The HOW of Co-Teaching,” which provide highly specific titles and scenarios to eliminate any doubt about each teacher’s role during the lesson. This shift helps fully utilize the talents of all adults and foster professional respect.

Q5: How important is dedicated planning time for a successful co-teaching partnership?

Dedicated co-planning time is essential and should be considered sacred. If co-teachers do not carve out time to plan together, their instructional effectiveness is minimized. Without this time, it is difficult to implement a successful co-taught classroom that incorporates state standards. Teachers need time to determine appropriate accommodations and adaptations. That said, The How of Co-teaching Lesson Plan Builder saves hours of co-planning time. The dedicated time you have can be as efficient as both of you coming together and deciding what strategies in the generated lesson plan you’ll use or not use. Have the discussion and move forward from there. It’s a huge time saver.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of co-teaching strategies and resources to maximize student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Best Practices in Co-teaching and Collaboration: the HOW of Implementing the Models

The post Why Co-Teaching Often Falls Short, and How to Fix It appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

What’s the one skill that can change everything for struggling learners—and even your highest achievers? It’s not test-taking. It’s not note-taking. It’s not even content mastery.

It’s this: learning how to learn.

We often assume students know how to study, remember, and process information. But most don’t. And in today’s diverse, fast-paced classrooms, explicitly teaching learning strategies isn’t optional—it’s essential. When we focus on helping students build personalized, brain-aligned tools they can use for life—not just for the next quiz—we change the game.

These learning strategies aren’t gimmicks. They’re how we equip students to take control of their learning, build confidence, and succeed in any subject.

Rehearsal: Strengthening Recall with Purpose

Let’s start with rehearsal strategies—the first layer of teaching students how to learn. These are memory tools like:

• Mnemonics: Think acronyms like NASA or rhymes like “Thirty days hath September…”

• Visualization: Encouraging students to create vivid mental pictures of content

• Creative Sentences: “Every Good Boy Does Fine” for musical notes is one we all know

Rehearsal helps learners—especially those with memory or executive function challenges—reduce mental load and store information efficiently. When we make recall easier, students spend less time spinning their wheels and more time thinking critically.

Elaboration: Making Learning Personal and Sticky

Rehearsal is the first step. Elaboration strategies take things further by asking students to connect new learning to what they already know. This might look like:

• Summarizing or rewriting text in their own words

• Creating personal analogies to explain new ideas

• Asking and answering their own “what if” questions

These elaboration techniques activate long-term memory and deepen comprehension. Students who struggle with retention benefit especially from strategies that make learning relevant to their own lives.

Organization: Helping the Brain “See” Information

When information is complicated or overwhelming, organization strategies create clarity. You’ve probably seen these in action:

• Graphic organizers and mind maps

• Sticky note coding (marking “!” for interesting, “L” for learned something new, “?” for questions)

• Color-coded note systems to help chunk content

For students with ADHD or executive functioning difficulties, these visual supports reduce overload and improve task completion. When we teach organization explicitly, we remove a major barrier to learning.

The Production Effect: Speak It, Draw It, Move It

Here’s a powerful strategy you may already be using without realizing it: The Production Effect. Research shows that when students say information out loud, draw it, or move while learning, memory consolidation improves.

Try this:

• Ask students to teach a concept to a peer

• Have them sketch ideas as they listen or read

• Use movement-based activities like “Vote with your feet” or group sorting

These activities don’t just make learning fun—they solidify it.

This Isn’t Just for “Advanced” Students

One of the biggest mindset shifts we can make as educators is this: self-regulation isn’t a gifted strategy—it’s an every-student strategy. Struggling learners often have the motivation but lack the tools. When we teach them how to learn, we give them access. We give them power.

These strategies are rooted in research-backed practices like Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and reflect how the brain actually processes and stores information. It’s time we stop saving the “good stuff” for honors students and start making it part of every classroom. These are tools students can carry into every grade, every job, and every challenge that comes their way.

When we teach students how to learn, we do more than raise test scores—we change lives.

Call to Action:

If this article resonates with you, you’re not alone—and you don’t have to figure it all out by yourself. Whether you’re a classroom teacher, instructional coach, or administrator, I offer dynamic in-person trainings and consultations that bring these strategies to life.

✅ Book me for a school inservice or district PD
✅ Explore my training materials on differentiated instruction
✅ Pick up your copy of Special Needs in the General Classroom for 500+ ready-to-use strategies

Let’s equip students to succeed—not just today, but for the long haul.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Teach Students How to Learn: The Gift That Changes Everything appeared first on Susan Fitzell.