One powerful solution is to combine microlearning with MTSS. In an inclusive classroom, small chunks of instruction, quick checks for understanding, and targeted intervention can help students access content, build confidence, and make steady academic progress.

In today’s inclusive classrooms, ensuring every student, from the advanced to the struggling learner, reaches their potential is the core mission. The Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) provides the organizational framework for this goal, addressing the needs of all learners through differentiated instruction. By integrating “microlearning” or the intentional use of small chunks of instruction and activities, educators can effectively deliver the tiered interventions essential to MTSS, especially in a secondary environment where finding adequate time for intervention is often a challenge.

The Framework: MTSS and Tiered Instruction

MTSS, or Multi-Tiered System of Supports, is a framework schools use to provide increasing levels of academic and behavioral support based on student need.

MTSS encompasses several approaches, including Response to Intervention (RTI). This system is graphically represented as an umbrella, emphasizing failure prevention. Central to MTSS/RTI is a tiered model of support:

• Tier One (Universal Support): This foundational level requires the use of best practice, research-based teaching methods, including differentiated instruction, for all students (80–90% of the population). Implementing effective strategies in the core classroom significantly reduces the need for subsequent interventions.
• Tier Two (Targeted Support): This tier is for students requiring targeted, high-quality interventions (5–10% of students). These interventions often use research-based practices from Tier One but are modified to provide more intense instruction, increased time for practice, and a higher intensity of implementation for specific students. For secondary students, strategies such as a tutor-led study hall combined with frequent, immediate in-class interventions, made possible by Chunking Lesson Plans™, can be highly effective.
• Tier Three (Intensive Individual Interventions): This tier serves the smallest percentage of students (1–5%) who require the most intensive interventions, often a combination of general classroom instruction and specialized outside-of-class support.

The Strategy: Small Chunks, Big Gains

The key to implementing effective interventions within a busy class schedule, particularly at the secondary level, lies in breaking down content and instruction into manageable segments. This concept is explicitly leveraged in “Chunking Lesson Plans®” to maximize instructional time and target student needs precisely.

How Microlearning Prevents Cognitive Overload

The goal of this microlearning approach is to prevent cognitive overload—since the brain typically holds only three to four chunks of novel information in short-term memory at a time—and enhance memory and retention.

What a Chunked Lesson Looks Like in a 40-Minute Class

A core component of this microlearning strategy is to shorten the duration of whole-class direct teaching. For example, in a 40-minute class period, the plan might involve:

1. Core Teach (10 minutes): Deliver essential instruction (e.g., teaching a concept like genre or the FOIL method) as effectively as if teaching a small group of capable students, and then stop.
2. Practice in Mixed Ability Groups (10 minutes): Immediately follow the core instruction by having students practice the new information in mixed-ability groups, allowing for application and reinforcement.
3. Whole Class Check-in (5 minutes): Bring the class back together for a quick question-and-answer session to clarify concepts and gauge understanding based on observations during group work.
4. Exit Card/Assessment (5 minutes): Use a quick assessment, such as an exit card with two or three questions, to immediately determine who needs re-teaching, practice, or enrichment.

Microlearning Strategies That Support Inclusive Instruction

The data collected from quick, frequent assessments like exit cards inform targeted, micro-interventions for the next class period. This allows the teacher to address learning differences right away, using the time saved from excessive direct instruction.

This can take the form of same-ability groups (e.g., grouping struggling students for a re-teach session) or peer-assisted learning models. Peer tutoring is especially effective, as it reinforces the tutor’s knowledge and skills while developing responsibility and self-confidence, making learning materials accessible and meaningful.

Enhancing Learning Through Small Adjustments

Microlearning principles extend beyond time management into the design of instructional materials and learning activities that respect how students learn. This includes utilizing multimodal strategies and cognitive supports:

• Visual Cues and Organization: Provide information in small chunks (5 to 7 pieces of information) and use graphic organizers, flowcharts, or mind maps to visually categorize material and demonstrate complex processes, freeing up working memory for higher-level thinking.
• Aiding Memory: Employ mnemonics, acronyms (like NASA), rhymes, and visualization techniques to aid recall, as the brain typically remembers color and unique visual content better than plain text. Even handwriting instructions clearly or adapting existing materials with adequate white space and larger font size provides essential scaffolding.
• Kinesthetic Engagement: Incorporate movement, like standing stations or acting out vocabulary words, to increase oxygen flow to the brain and engage multiple areas in the learning process, supporting kinesthetic learners and enhancing retention.
• Fostering Self-Regulation: By implementing chunked assignments with parts due at specific dates, students (especially perceptive types) can manage their workload effectively and are actively taught organizational strategies and self-monitoring skills, key components of success in a personalized learning environment.

By systematically implementing small, targeted instructional practices within the overarching MTSS framework, educators can create an inclusive environment where the focus shifts from struggling with content presentation to achieving mastery through individualized and carefully paced learning opportunities. This intentional focus on small chunks yields big gains for all students.

If you’d like more practical strategies to help your team move from awareness to action, I offer PD sessions and coaching built around the strategies outlined in Special Needs in the General Classroom. Let’s build forward—not backward.

FAQ: Microlearning, MTSS, and Inclusive Classrooms

What is microlearning in the classroom?
Microlearning in the classroom is the practice of delivering instruction in short, focused segments instead of long blocks of direct teaching. Teachers use small chunks of content, quick practice opportunities, and brief assessments to help students process information more effectively and avoid cognitive overload.

How does microlearning support MTSS?
Microlearning supports MTSS by making tiered instruction more manageable and responsive. In Tier One, it improves core instruction for all students. In Tier Two, it allows for targeted reteaching and focused practice. In Tier Three, it helps educators deliver more intensive, individualized intervention based on student data.

Why is chunking instruction effective for struggling learners?
Chunking instruction is effective because it reduces the amount of new information students must process at one time. When content is broken into smaller parts, students are more likely to understand, retain, and apply what they are learning. This is especially helpful for students with working memory challenges, attention differences, or gaps in prior knowledge.

Can microlearning help advanced students too?
Yes. Microlearning benefits advanced learners as well as struggling learners. Because instruction is clearer and more intentional, advanced students can move more quickly into application, peer support, discussion, and enrichment tasks. In an inclusive classroom, small chunks create flexibility for all learners.

What are simple microlearning strategies teachers can use right away?
Teachers can start with short direct instruction, mixed-ability practice groups, exit cards, graphic organizers, movement-based review, mnemonic supports, and chunked assignments with clear deadlines. These strategies fit well within an MTSS model because they provide immediate data and support differentiated instruction.

Additional Reading 

MTSS and RTI – Seven Keys to Success
By Susan Fitzell https://susanfitzell.com/mtss-seven-keys-successful-rti/

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post How Microlearning Supports MTSS in Inclusive Classrooms appeared first on Susan Fitzell.

What if we designed classrooms around how the brain learns best; not just standards, pacing guides, or coverage goals? As schools shift toward inclusive education, teachers need approaches that reach a wide range of learners without lowering expectations. One practical way to do that is to combine brain-based learning principles with a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and microlearning. Together, they strengthen Tier 1 instruction, reduce cognitive overload, and build the self-regulation students need to become successful, independent learners.

Susan Fitzell’s School House Model provides a visual framework for aligning instruction with student needs. This model reminds us that academic instruction, represented by the “Functions” or nuts and bolts (the curriculum), must be supported by two critical structures. The foundation is based on building a strong community, connection, and cooperation. Above this foundation is the “Framework,” which must be based on current brain and educational research and an understanding of how students learn. MTSS and microlearning work together to support this comprehensive, whole-house approach—from foundation to function.

Brain-Based Meets Tier-Based

MTSS is a multi-tiered system that incorporates Response to Intervention (RTI), with a core goal of failure prevention. The foundational element, Tier One, demands the use of best practice, research-based teaching methods, including differentiated instruction, for all students (80–90% of the population),,. Implementing brain-friendly strategies in Tier 1 benefits all learners, ensuring instruction aligns with how the brain naturally processes and retains information.

A traditional reading lesson might involve extended reading and a standard writing prompt. However, a brain-friendly approach leverages microlearning techniques to maintain engagement and retention:

• Color-coding vocabulary to support memory encoding: Color is a powerful memory tool, helping students retain information better than black and white text. Using color to categorize or highlight text makes the information unique, aiding visual recall,. Color-coding the parts of speech, for example, assigns nouns a unique color (like red, relating to a stop sign) and verbs a movement color (like green, relating to ‘go’).

• Paired think-alouds to encourage interpersonal interaction and verbal rehearsal: Verbalizing concepts is crucial for learning, as students often discover gaps in their understanding when they attempt to explain information to others. Strategies like Think-Pair-Share or Thinking Aloud Paired Problem Solving (TAPPS) engage students in active rehearsal.

• Chunked instruction, where students process one paragraph at a time using graphic organizers: The brain’s capacity for holding new information in short-term memory is limited to roughly three to four chunks at a time. Breaking down content into smaller, manageable pieces prevents cognitive overload. Using graphic organizers, flowcharts, or mind maps during this process visually categorizes material and helps students see patterns and relationships, supporting deeper understanding.

• Doodling key ideas as a form of nonlinguistic representation: Nonlinguistic representation, such as drawing or visualizing concepts, is a research-supported strategy that requires students to process content in new ways. This “production effect”—speaking or drawing during recall—further strengthens the encoding and memory consolidation process.

All these methods employ differentiation (Differentiated Instruction or DI) that is “good for all” students and “critical for different learners”, making instruction effective for everyone in the general classroom environment.

Self-Regulation: The Secret Weapon

The goal of instruction is to move students from being struggling learners to being successful learners by fostering self-regulation. Self-regulated learning is the most important characteristic of expert learners. These learners implement a plan that includes setting clear performance and process goals, employing clear strategies (including time management), controlling their motivation, and monitoring their own progress.

Microlearning supports these metacognitive habits. For instance, perceptive students often procrastinate, seeking information until the last minute. Teachers can mitigate this by breaking assignments down into small chunks with specific due dates, teaching students organizational strategies and self-monitoring skills. When students practice strategies frequently for short amounts of time, it is more effective than overwhelming the brain with too much at once, accelerating the learning process.

Beyond Remediation

Too often, struggling students are pulled out, slowed down, or given “easier” material, creating lower expectations that diminish their chance to achieve their greatest potential. But what if the problem isn’t the student—it’s the size of the instructional bite?

Instead of relying solely on remediation after failure, MTSS encourages adapting Tier 1 instruction to prevent failure from the outset. By intentionally structuring lessons using small, brain-aligned chunks—such as the Chunking Lesson Plans™ approach,—teachers ensure that instruction matches the capacity of the brain to learn and process new concepts effectively. This way, students who might otherwise be labeled “at risk” or “learning disabled” can remain in the rigorous general classroom environment, benefiting from high expectations and specialized instructional support embedded seamlessly into the daily lesson.

FAQ

1. How does microlearning support MTSS, especially Tier 1?
Microlearning fits Tier 1 because it makes strong, research-based instruction easier for all learners to process and retain. Instead of long, overloaded lessons, teachers deliver content in smaller chunks with frequent practice, which aligns with working memory limits and reduces cognitive overload. This improves engagement and retention for the 80–90% served in Tier 1, and it helps prevent failure before students need more intensive tiers.

2. What brain-based strategies in the article are most useful for differentiated instruction in a general classroom?
The article highlights four practical strategies that scale well in Tier 1 while still meeting diverse needs: color-coding vocabulary or parts of speech to strengthen encoding and recall; paired think-alouds like Think-Pair-Share or TAPPS to build rehearsal and reveal misunderstandings; chunked instruction using graphic organizers to manage working memory limits; and doodling or drawing key ideas as nonlinguistic representation to deepen processing and improve recall.

Why does “chunking” matter from a brain-based learning perspective?
Because working memory can hold only a small number of new “chunks” at once, long passages or multi-step directions can overload students, especially those who struggle. Chunking instruction into smaller parts, like one paragraph at a time, helps students process information without the system collapsing under cognitive load. Pairing chunking with visual tools like graphic organizers helps students see patterns and relationships, which supports deeper understanding.

How do think-aloud strategies improve learning and assessment at the same time?
When students verbalize their thinking, they rehearse the content, which strengthens learning. At the same time, explaining ideas out loud often exposes gaps in understanding that silent work can hide. Structures like Think-Pair-Share or TAPPS create a routine for interpersonal interaction, immediate feedback, and active processing, which supports both comprehension and retention.

How does this approach shift MTSS away from remediation and toward prevention?
Instead of pulling students out, lowering expectations, or giving “easier” work after failure, the article argues for improving Tier 1 instruction so more students succeed in the rigorous general classroom. By designing lessons around small, brain-aligned instructional “bites,” and embedding supportive strategies as part of everyday teaching, students who might otherwise be labeled “at risk” can keep up with higher expectations while receiving targeted support inside the core environment.

Bibliography

Burnett, S. (n.d.). The A-Z of Differentiated Instruction.

Cowan, N. (2010). The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science a Journal of the American Psychological Society, 19(1), 51–57. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277

Fitzell, S. G. (n.d.). 360 Inservice, slide 3.

Fitzell, S. G. (n.d.). 360 Inservice, slide 165.

Fitzell, S. G. (2011). RTI Strategies for Secondary Teachers. London: Sage Publications.

Fitzell, S. G. (2017). Special Needs in the General Classroom: 500+ Teaching Strategies for Differentiating Instruction (3rd ed.). Manchester: Cogent Catalyst Publications.

Marzano Debra J. Pollock, Jane E., R. J. P., Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Wong, B. (2010). Points of view: Color coding. Nature Methods, 7(8), 573–573. http://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0810-573.

CLICK HERE to discover a wealth of teaching strategies and resources for maximizing student success!. Bring Susan to your campus! Featured seminar – Differentiation Strategies to Reach ALL Learners in the Inclusive Classroom

The post Building Brain-Friendly Classrooms with MTSS and Microlearning appeared first on Susan Fitzell.